I found this experiment to be extremely difficult because
the level of understanding was very low. It was hard to communicate with my
partner through the methods I had at my disposal. I found myself getting
frustrated with my partner even though I knew that it wasn’t her fault she
couldn’t understand what was happening. My partner had a huge impact on what I
was doing as well as I had a huge impact on how she was communicating. I found
that she was trying very hard to understand me and she listened very intently,
focused on what I was trying to communicate to her. She also communicated
slower as if it was harder for me to understand because I had less ability to
communicate with her. I tried to let her know that I could still understand her
just as well as if I hadn’t been communicatively impaired, but she had a hard
time understanding that. I found that
only about half of what I was trying to get her to understand was actually
comprehended. The other fifty percent was given up on due to the frustration
and difficulty I was having. If we were two different cultures meeting for the
first time the person with the advantage is definitely the person with the
ability to speak. The reason for this is because they also have different
gestures and body language or cultural universals that can be conveyed with the
language. Individuals that have lower mental capacity find it harder to
communicate as well as people with certain diseases and from different
cultures. It affects how people communicate with them because conversations are
shorter, people get angry, and it makes it much more difficult to just
communicate naturally.
The second way of communicating using only my voice without
any signals was just as hard as the other way in my opinion. I was able to last
the fifteen minutes but I did make some mistakes at certain points. It was
interesting because my partner could understand everything I was saying but she
lost interest. I couldn’t keep her interested in any subject I brought up. It
was very hard to convey different emotions. I had a hard time conveying the
importance of certain things to me as well. At one point we got on the subject
of politics and I found it interesting that she couldn’t tell whether I liked
or disliked a certain politician because of the lack of fluctuation in my
voice. Of course after a couple minutes she figured at my point of view it just
took longer than it normally would have. This experiment showed me just how
important signals are in communication. Without it everything becomes very slow
and boring and hard to understand. People that have difficulty reading body
language must have it much harder to communicate and understand where somebody
is coming from. Possessing the ability to read body language is helpful in
countless circumstances. Understanding peoples emotions and stance on things
can sometimes be more important than hearing what they are saying about it.
Experiment 1 would have been easier had we been able to
write down what we were trying to say. There is also a major drawback to
writing as well. The drawback being the amount of time it would take to
communicate via pen and paper. This would take up a lot of time and much of
what we did discuss during the time period would not have been mentioned. The
written language is very helpful to the culture that developed it because it
provides a way to communicate with people that aren’t near you. It also creates
a more formal approach to communication as well as keeping in communication
with more people than possible just through verbal communication. The written
language has had a huge impact on the globalization of ideas through its quick
and simple way of spreading such information all throughout the world.
I agree that experiment 1 would have been much easier if we could have written down what we wanted to say. I liked how you said about the drawback of having to write down what you want to say when trying to have a conversation. I did not think about it like that until I read your blog. I agree that written commuincation is more of a formal approach such as things like resumes. I liked reading your post and glad to see that other people thought this experiment was quit difficult! Good job enjoyed your blog!!
ReplyDelete"She also communicated slower as if it was harder for me to understand because I had less ability to communicate with her."
ReplyDeleteIsn't it interesting that the partner slows down their speech, even though that doesn't help you at all? :-) That's a common response from tourists as well. Ugly American syndrome.
I like how you highlighted that your partner lost interest in the second part even with full use of spoken language.
Can you think of any circumstances where it would be beneficial to NOT read body language?
Good work in the last paragraph highlighting benefits and drawbacks of written language.
Nicely done.
Writing is one of tool of communication however it is not only in writing we can communicate.Gestures, signs, facial expressions, speech, body language. All these defines culture and its limitations. It doesnt mean that one gestures or expression is acceptable to the other, that why it has also its limitations.
ReplyDeletewritten language is a great way to communicate in my opinion also. Especially when it is hard to talk to someone that is far away from you over the phone and be able to completly express yourself. Written language can also help with people who have trouble communicationing verbally.
ReplyDelete